Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:35

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Why the end of Google as we know it could be your biggest opportunity yet - ZDNet
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Don’t Miss This Rare Chance to See the Milky Way’s Glowing Core - SciTechDaily
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
If babies could write, what questions would they ask on Quora?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
First quantum-mechanical model of quasicrystals reveals why they exist - Phys.org
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What is the dirtiest thing you have witnessed your wife do?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?